Showing posts with label news blogging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label news blogging. Show all posts
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Half of Americans Now Get News Digitally; Third of Young People Get it Through Social Media
Here it is. The latest Pew "Trends in News Consumption" study founds that half of all Americans get their news online. One-third of adults under 30 now get their news via social media, particularly on Facebook and Twitter. Read it.
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
UCLA Extension New Media Reporting 2012 Week 9 Summary
During our Week 9 session we debated the viability of news organizations' online paywalls. Some of you liked the idea that journalists should be paid more directly for the good work they do, but others saw the advantage in seeking out wider audiences via free delivery.
Ultimately, I argued, it would be hard to plug all the holes in such a porous, aggregated news world anyway, noting that it's quite easy to get past the Los Angeles Times' and New York Times' paywalls and, even if you couldn't, subscriber-bloggers would simply repeat their info.
Not that this is ideal. It's just the world we're working in.
We looked at how advertising is affecting the business, including a recent Pew study showing that traditional print news outlets were losing $10 in print advertising for every $1 in online ads they gained.
But, I noted, online readership is king -- online ad revenue was projected to be passing up print dollars this year -- and the production costs of getting eyeballs to see your news are much less than those of putting out a daily newspaper.
LA Weekly competes in a daily news market and comes up with a near-the-top readership ranking with only a handful of people. Paper, ink, delivery and production can take up as much as 65 percent of the costs of a traditional print operation. Add to that the idea that most news sites are much more niche-oriented and audience-specific. You probably wouldn't start an operation today that covers City Hall and sports, celebrities and recipes. It wouldn't make sense. You would focus. So if you doing an online-operation, you're starting with far fewer costs. At the same time, the readership potential is larger:
One in four Americans gets their news from a mobile device. And that number appears to be growing.
Putting up a wall could hinder your ability to reach the masses and make that smaller ad dollar more effective.
Not only that, but knowing your customer can mean bigger ad revenues. To cast a wide net like a traditional newspaper and hope that some of its many customers are, say, going to buy a watch soon is ineffective in today's environment. If you get to know your readers a little, that can be valuable.
One writer (previously noted) argues that paywalls punish those you need most -- your loyal reader. The casual reader should pay, not your regular, the argument goes: You want your regular customers to spend some time so you get to figure out what they're into.
We talked about how the iPad, for example, is showing that open access to your news can pay off in the form of previously slow nighttime readership (people like to cozy up with their iPads and seem to check news more frequently after work, leading to boosts in readers for late posts).
Finally, I encouraged everyone to promote themselves. It can be a third of the work these days. Don't be shy. Establish websites that reflect you as a news brand and present your best work.
Ultimately, I argued, it would be hard to plug all the holes in such a porous, aggregated news world anyway, noting that it's quite easy to get past the Los Angeles Times' and New York Times' paywalls and, even if you couldn't, subscriber-bloggers would simply repeat their info.
Not that this is ideal. It's just the world we're working in.
We looked at how advertising is affecting the business, including a recent Pew study showing that traditional print news outlets were losing $10 in print advertising for every $1 in online ads they gained.
But, I noted, online readership is king -- online ad revenue was projected to be passing up print dollars this year -- and the production costs of getting eyeballs to see your news are much less than those of putting out a daily newspaper.
LA Weekly competes in a daily news market and comes up with a near-the-top readership ranking with only a handful of people. Paper, ink, delivery and production can take up as much as 65 percent of the costs of a traditional print operation. Add to that the idea that most news sites are much more niche-oriented and audience-specific. You probably wouldn't start an operation today that covers City Hall and sports, celebrities and recipes. It wouldn't make sense. You would focus. So if you doing an online-operation, you're starting with far fewer costs. At the same time, the readership potential is larger:
One in four Americans gets their news from a mobile device. And that number appears to be growing.
Putting up a wall could hinder your ability to reach the masses and make that smaller ad dollar more effective.
Not only that, but knowing your customer can mean bigger ad revenues. To cast a wide net like a traditional newspaper and hope that some of its many customers are, say, going to buy a watch soon is ineffective in today's environment. If you get to know your readers a little, that can be valuable.
One writer (previously noted) argues that paywalls punish those you need most -- your loyal reader. The casual reader should pay, not your regular, the argument goes: You want your regular customers to spend some time so you get to figure out what they're into.
We talked about how the iPad, for example, is showing that open access to your news can pay off in the form of previously slow nighttime readership (people like to cozy up with their iPads and seem to check news more frequently after work, leading to boosts in readers for late posts).
Finally, I encouraged everyone to promote themselves. It can be a third of the work these days. Don't be shy. Establish websites that reflect you as a news brand and present your best work.
Tuesday, September 4, 2012
Tools For News Bloggers
Here's a pretty good list of "22 tools and apps every journalism student should know about." Make that every journalist should know about. Check it out.
UCLA New Media Reporting 2012: Week 8 Summary
During Week 8 we took a look at the art of getting readers to interact with us, mainly through Twitter and Facebook. It's not so easy but, as you'll see in a post below, getting folks to spend time with your content is crucial to the future of digital journalism.
Most of you in the class, however, are naturals at interacting through social media and had no problem getting friends and family to comment on your work. Sometimes all it took was an introduction in the form of a question (such as, "Do you agree with this?") to get people to weigh in on a Facebook posting.
We took a quick look at how to use Scribd to embed documents. I think it's a pretty cool way to lead readers to your source material. It helps you gain cred.
We talked a little bit more about doing lists. They're important because they're accessible and can multiply pageviews. But I noted that they don't always have to be tabloidy. I highlighted my colleague Simone Wilson's recent post on legislation being rammed through the California legislature -- and I pointed out that even the mighty Gawker was doing them.
We then got into longform journalism, and the idea that not all digital reporting has to focus on short, snarky writing. In fact, the online revolution has really opened up the prospects for longform storytelling because there are no space constraints. The limits are imposed, rather, by how much interest you can drum up in readers.
But many journalists and even publications such as Vanity Fair have tapped into the potential, using Amazon's Kindle Singles to expand magazine-size articles into short books that can be sold online. Self publishing is the rage. It's not always profitable, but it's a new opportunity for digital journalists.
We worked on a live news post based on an LAPD press release and discovered that it's not always easy to inject voice into a story and still be timely. But it can be done.
The assignment was to read this excerpt of Chris Anderson's book Free and argue for or against charging readers for news (a.k.a. instituting the kind of paywalls used by the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and the Wall Street journal). Five paragraphs were requested.
Most of you in the class, however, are naturals at interacting through social media and had no problem getting friends and family to comment on your work. Sometimes all it took was an introduction in the form of a question (such as, "Do you agree with this?") to get people to weigh in on a Facebook posting.
We took a quick look at how to use Scribd to embed documents. I think it's a pretty cool way to lead readers to your source material. It helps you gain cred.
We talked a little bit more about doing lists. They're important because they're accessible and can multiply pageviews. But I noted that they don't always have to be tabloidy. I highlighted my colleague Simone Wilson's recent post on legislation being rammed through the California legislature -- and I pointed out that even the mighty Gawker was doing them.
We then got into longform journalism, and the idea that not all digital reporting has to focus on short, snarky writing. In fact, the online revolution has really opened up the prospects for longform storytelling because there are no space constraints. The limits are imposed, rather, by how much interest you can drum up in readers.
But many journalists and even publications such as Vanity Fair have tapped into the potential, using Amazon's Kindle Singles to expand magazine-size articles into short books that can be sold online. Self publishing is the rage. It's not always profitable, but it's a new opportunity for digital journalists.
We worked on a live news post based on an LAPD press release and discovered that it's not always easy to inject voice into a story and still be timely. But it can be done.
The assignment was to read this excerpt of Chris Anderson's book Free and argue for or against charging readers for news (a.k.a. instituting the kind of paywalls used by the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and the Wall Street journal). Five paragraphs were requested.
Why Journalism Should Care About Quality Time
If newspapers and other outlets are to make a successful transition to digital, they need to think more about getting readers, viewers and listeners to spend more time with them, according to this argument:
The idea here is also to create a "reverse paywall" where readers want to pay for extras. Yeah?
... Getting to know your readers and their interests better can also help a newspaper or any other media entity target advertising better. One of the reasons why advertisers are so enamored of Facebook and other social networks is that they can target specific niche groups or demographics or locations within the broader market, like expectant mothers or high-spending seniors. What do newspapers know about their readers? In most cases, very little, other than the vague generalities that phone surveys produce.
The idea here is also to create a "reverse paywall" where readers want to pay for extras. Yeah?
Video News Blogging
The Wall Street Journal recently announced a section dedicated solely to video captured by it's reporters. I'm not sure raw video will propel traffic, but it's an interesting move. Check it out.
The Popularity of Lists
I've spoken a lot about the popularity of lists. They're accessible to the casual leader and, if done right, they can multiply your pageviews if you brake them up into multiple pages.
I was surprised to see the mighty Washington Post today run a list! Check it out.
I was surprised to see the mighty Washington Post today run a list! Check it out.
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
New Media Reporting Summer 2012 Week 7 Summary
During week 7 we finally demonstrated how to post a YouTube video on a blog (rocket science, this), and we went over creating and embedding a Google map again. (For examples scroll down through this blog).
Our students did a great job of creating and posting original video. I think the exercise supports why I believe that video is most often a supplementary part of modern digital journalism. If you're stealing time from work reading news, watching a lot of long and heavily produced video is a risk for your average viewer.
Also, uploading and editing video longer than 30 seconds can be a chore for both you and your bandwidth. Try breaking up videos into segments, posting multiple clips and narrating your way from asset to asset.
We looked at Google Analytics and broke down both traffic sources (incoming websites and referrals) and search engine keywords that were sending readers our way. We found out that Facebook and Twitter sharing, as well as sites such as Reddit and StumbleUpon, were taking up an increasing share of the referral pie.
Search and SEO is still king, but less so. (Also, Google has been discounting SEO keywords to give less weight to so-called "content farms" and those trying to game it with less-than optimal news content, which I think is a good thing for our business. You can read more about that here).
We talked about how Google+ might not be the best place to find your friends, but it is a good place to post your content. Google search gives news found on Google+ a little more weight. (Some news organizations are experimenting with Google+ Hangouts -- live video chats with reporters -- but we don't get it, yet).
Finally we talked about "live tweeting." If you're at a breaking news event, why should you give away the milk via Twitter when readers should be buying the cow by reading your whole story when you post it?
I think live tweeting is good for you. It establishes you as a news authority and source, even if you're giving up scoops, angles and details to the competition. In the long run it will reward you with both credibility and followers. And it helps you organize the roadside markers of a story, even photos that you've tweeted. You can use those to help you construct a final take. Finally, in most cases you'd never be able to write a complete story as fast as you'd be able to tweet developments. Give people some news. They'll come back for the narrative.
Our homework was to write a post, aggregated is okay, post it to Facebook and/or Twitter AND get someone to comment on it (either directly on your blog or on Facebook). Not as easy as it sounds!
Our students did a great job of creating and posting original video. I think the exercise supports why I believe that video is most often a supplementary part of modern digital journalism. If you're stealing time from work reading news, watching a lot of long and heavily produced video is a risk for your average viewer.
Also, uploading and editing video longer than 30 seconds can be a chore for both you and your bandwidth. Try breaking up videos into segments, posting multiple clips and narrating your way from asset to asset.
We looked at Google Analytics and broke down both traffic sources (incoming websites and referrals) and search engine keywords that were sending readers our way. We found out that Facebook and Twitter sharing, as well as sites such as Reddit and StumbleUpon, were taking up an increasing share of the referral pie.
Search and SEO is still king, but less so. (Also, Google has been discounting SEO keywords to give less weight to so-called "content farms" and those trying to game it with less-than optimal news content, which I think is a good thing for our business. You can read more about that here).
We talked about how Google+ might not be the best place to find your friends, but it is a good place to post your content. Google search gives news found on Google+ a little more weight. (Some news organizations are experimenting with Google+ Hangouts -- live video chats with reporters -- but we don't get it, yet).
Finally we talked about "live tweeting." If you're at a breaking news event, why should you give away the milk via Twitter when readers should be buying the cow by reading your whole story when you post it?
I think live tweeting is good for you. It establishes you as a news authority and source, even if you're giving up scoops, angles and details to the competition. In the long run it will reward you with both credibility and followers. And it helps you organize the roadside markers of a story, even photos that you've tweeted. You can use those to help you construct a final take. Finally, in most cases you'd never be able to write a complete story as fast as you'd be able to tweet developments. Give people some news. They'll come back for the narrative.
Our homework was to write a post, aggregated is okay, post it to Facebook and/or Twitter AND get someone to comment on it (either directly on your blog or on Facebook). Not as easy as it sounds!
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Who to Follow on Twitter
Here's a selective list of Twitter users to follow, in no particular order, if you're looking for news.
JOURNALISTS AND OUTLETS
Andrew Blankstein, Los Angeles Times police reporter.
Richard Winton, Los Angeles Times police reporter.
Robert Lopez, Los Angeles Times police reporter.
Kevin Roderick, publisher of LA Observed.
Claudia Peschiutta, reporter, KNX 1070 Newsradio.
KNX 1070 Newsradio.
California Watch.
LAist.
LA Now, Los Angeles Times' local news blog.
Kimi Yoshino, Los Angeles Times assignment editor.
David Begnaud, KTLA News reporter.
Rina911, KPCC crime reporter.
89.3 KPCC.
L.A. Daily News.
CBS 2 KCAL9 Breaking.
ABC7 Eyewitness News.
KTLA News Desk.
myFOX Los Angeles.
Bobby DeCastro, Fox 11 morning news.
TMZ.
Harvey Levin.
STRINGERinLA.
NBC Los Angeles.
tvtoni.
Los Angeles News.
Angie Crouch, NBC Los Angeles.
Simone Wilson, LA Weekly.
Jill Stewart, LA Weekly.
Gene Maddaus, LA Weekly.
Sarah Fenske, LA Weekly.
LA Weekly.
The Informer (LAWeeklyNews).
POLICE AND FIRE AND MORE
LAFD Conversation.
LASD Tony (sheriff's press info).
Mike Parker (sheriff's press info).
LAPD Communications.
LAPD HQ.
Cal Fire News.
USGS Earthquake CA.
SCANNERS
LA County Fire.com.
Venice 311.
Weho Daily.
LAScanner.
BHScanner.
Hollywood 311.
Koreatown311.
sgvscanner.
Culvercity311.
JOURNALISTS AND OUTLETS
Andrew Blankstein, Los Angeles Times police reporter.
Richard Winton, Los Angeles Times police reporter.
Robert Lopez, Los Angeles Times police reporter.
Kevin Roderick, publisher of LA Observed.
Claudia Peschiutta, reporter, KNX 1070 Newsradio.
KNX 1070 Newsradio.
California Watch.
LAist.
LA Now, Los Angeles Times' local news blog.
Kimi Yoshino, Los Angeles Times assignment editor.
David Begnaud, KTLA News reporter.
Rina911, KPCC crime reporter.
89.3 KPCC.
L.A. Daily News.
CBS 2 KCAL9 Breaking.
ABC7 Eyewitness News.
KTLA News Desk.
myFOX Los Angeles.
Bobby DeCastro, Fox 11 morning news.
TMZ.
Harvey Levin.
STRINGERinLA.
NBC Los Angeles.
tvtoni.
Los Angeles News.
Angie Crouch, NBC Los Angeles.
Simone Wilson, LA Weekly.
Jill Stewart, LA Weekly.
Gene Maddaus, LA Weekly.
Sarah Fenske, LA Weekly.
LA Weekly.
The Informer (LAWeeklyNews).
POLICE AND FIRE AND MORE
LAFD Conversation.
LASD Tony (sheriff's press info).
Mike Parker (sheriff's press info).
LAPD Communications.
LAPD HQ.
Cal Fire News.
USGS Earthquake CA.
SCANNERS
LA County Fire.com.
Venice 311.
Weho Daily.
LAScanner.
BHScanner.
Hollywood 311.
Koreatown311.
sgvscanner.
Culvercity311.
Wednesday, August 22, 2012
UCLA Extension New Media Reporting Summer 2012: Week 6 Summary
During Week 6 we talked a little more about voice. We used an example of a story in the New York Times about how Mitt Romney said he never paid less than 13 percent of his annual income in taxes and wondered how it might have been written with more attitude. We looked at how Gawker treated the same story.
We moved on to crime reporting in the digital era. Being on the cop beat isn't for everyone who wants to get into digital journalism, but just as with print, it's a good basis for figuring out the elements of our profession.
As you figured out with your Week 5 assignment, dealing with cops isn't always fun, but it's good exercise for reporting. But in this new era we can also get crime information from Nixle, police Twitter accounts, eyewitness Twitter accounts (who sometimes post usable photos from the scene of an incident), and police Facebook pages.
Besides the LAPD's blog and YouTube page there's a lot of crime info out there. The L.A. Sheriff's Department uses Twitter and Nixle extensively.
We talked a little about the new rules of online reporting: Break news if you can. If you can "be there," at a press conference or at the scene of a crime, you've got a huge advantage. But your next chance at gaining eyeballs and a competitive edge is to forward already broken news by picking up the phone or mining social media for new information that will add a new chapter to the story. Finally, you can take the Gawker route and simply add your spin, your voice, and your ranting to an existing story. The every popular list (5 ways to beat a parking ticket) falls into that last category.
We attempted a live demo of recording a quick video, uploading it to YouTube and embedding it in a post. Slow upload times meant that we'll have to try again during Week 7.
Finally we did a demo on creating a custom Google Map and embedding it in a post.
The assignment was to create an original YouTube video and embed it in a post with a few grafs explaining what it's about.
We moved on to crime reporting in the digital era. Being on the cop beat isn't for everyone who wants to get into digital journalism, but just as with print, it's a good basis for figuring out the elements of our profession.
As you figured out with your Week 5 assignment, dealing with cops isn't always fun, but it's good exercise for reporting. But in this new era we can also get crime information from Nixle, police Twitter accounts, eyewitness Twitter accounts (who sometimes post usable photos from the scene of an incident), and police Facebook pages.
Besides the LAPD's blog and YouTube page there's a lot of crime info out there. The L.A. Sheriff's Department uses Twitter and Nixle extensively.
We talked a little about the new rules of online reporting: Break news if you can. If you can "be there," at a press conference or at the scene of a crime, you've got a huge advantage. But your next chance at gaining eyeballs and a competitive edge is to forward already broken news by picking up the phone or mining social media for new information that will add a new chapter to the story. Finally, you can take the Gawker route and simply add your spin, your voice, and your ranting to an existing story. The every popular list (5 ways to beat a parking ticket) falls into that last category.
We attempted a live demo of recording a quick video, uploading it to YouTube and embedding it in a post. Slow upload times meant that we'll have to try again during Week 7.
Finally we did a demo on creating a custom Google Map and embedding it in a post.
The assignment was to create an original YouTube video and embed it in a post with a few grafs explaining what it's about.
Thursday, August 16, 2012
How Can Social Media Help You Cover Protests?
The Poynter Institute asks that question of Los Angeles Times' reporter Kate Linthicum, who talks about how she used Twitter to help her get a handle on the Occupy movement.
Labels:
blogging,
digital journalism,
New Media Reporting,
news blogging,
Occupy
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Here are the New Media Reporting news blogs for summer, 2012:
Russell Allyn
Ruth Boyle
Theresa Cheng
Maria Colias
Collette DeBenedetto
Claire Doran
Donald Hughes
Alice Marsh-Elmer
Marisa Mostek
Lyndsey Nolan
Renae Punzalan
Rebecca Robledo
Claudia Silva
Daina Solomon
Mikaela Wolf
Russell Allyn
Ruth Boyle
Theresa Cheng
Maria Colias
Collette DeBenedetto
Claire Doran
Donald Hughes
Alice Marsh-Elmer
Marisa Mostek
Lyndsey Nolan
Renae Punzalan
Rebecca Robledo
Claudia Silva
Daina Solomon
Mikaela Wolf
Labels:
digital journalism,
New Media Reporting,
news,
news blogging
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
UCLA Extension New Media Reporting Summer 2012: Week 5 Summary
During Week 5 we talked about digging into Facebook and Twitter to find out about subjects in the news.
In cases, for example, where someone dies, we can sometimes add the term "RIP" to their name and find pages dedicated to them, with photos, commentary and family history.
I used the case of a young man killed in a stabbing recently in Santa Monica. We used Facebook to discover a little about him, including that he and the suspect knew each other and went to high school together.
I got into aggregation more. I wanted to make the point that journalism has a history of aggregation. In Washington when the New York Times gets a huge scoop on the president, for example, often other outlets follow, crediting the paper. Contemporary aggregation is no less legitimate. In fact, with the ability to link, it's more so, as we're driving traffic to the source.
In local television news, outlets have long used a form of shadow aggregation: One station will jump on breaking news, City News Service, a pay-service wire, will pick it up, and the competition will break into programming to announce that "wire services are reporting" that a major event just happened. Yep.
But you can do better: One way is take a story that's already been developed and move it forward. Sometimes a phone call or two can "advance" the story, or give it an exclusive spin or scoop. Even though say, the Los Angeles Times discovered some news, you can be first to discover a new development. You still need to link to the originator, however.
In fact, if all you have is one source for your story, and it's another outlet and its well-done reporting, it's often the rule that you should just do a few grafs and then let readers find out more by jumping to the original via your embedded link.
Unless you have fresh info, expertise or a unique perspective on a story, a la Gawker, that's the way to go.
In cases, for example, where someone dies, we can sometimes add the term "RIP" to their name and find pages dedicated to them, with photos, commentary and family history.
I used the case of a young man killed in a stabbing recently in Santa Monica. We used Facebook to discover a little about him, including that he and the suspect knew each other and went to high school together.
I got into aggregation more. I wanted to make the point that journalism has a history of aggregation. In Washington when the New York Times gets a huge scoop on the president, for example, often other outlets follow, crediting the paper. Contemporary aggregation is no less legitimate. In fact, with the ability to link, it's more so, as we're driving traffic to the source.
In local television news, outlets have long used a form of shadow aggregation: One station will jump on breaking news, City News Service, a pay-service wire, will pick it up, and the competition will break into programming to announce that "wire services are reporting" that a major event just happened. Yep.
But you can do better: One way is take a story that's already been developed and move it forward. Sometimes a phone call or two can "advance" the story, or give it an exclusive spin or scoop. Even though say, the Los Angeles Times discovered some news, you can be first to discover a new development. You still need to link to the originator, however.
In fact, if all you have is one source for your story, and it's another outlet and its well-done reporting, it's often the rule that you should just do a few grafs and then let readers find out more by jumping to the original via your embedded link.
Unless you have fresh info, expertise or a unique perspective on a story, a la Gawker, that's the way to go.
UCLA Extension New Media Reporting Summer 2012: Week 4 Summary
During Week 4 we talked about what an ideal, "aggregated" story looks like. We noted that even the New York Times does this, drawing from diverse sources and using links, to create a well-informed piece.
We took a look at how some outlets, including the Los Angeles Times, use Storify to compile tweets about a news event.
I expressed my opinion that I liked it better if the compilation of such tweets were choreographed and guided by the author's voice and not just stacked.
We compared two broadcast sites, KTLA News and KPCC 89.3 FM, and talked about what they did and didn't do well. One common concern was their inability to translate their broadcast reporting expertise on the web, though KPCC was doing an interesting job of posting audio clips. The identity of the two sites was in question too: KTLA used a lot of national stories, but it's a local news operation on-air. KPCC was dry and statewide. We weren't sure what it wants to be.
We talked about why voice, snark and opinion is so crucial today: We're fighting for your attention, and there's a lot of competition. This explains the rise of sites like buzzfeed and Gawker.
We talked a little about how to use audio. If I get something good on audio, I like to upload it to Soundcloud and embed it in a story.
But with audio and video, I feel that the journalist has to lead the story with print-style reporting. Rarely does video or audio lead the show. Even when it does it needs to be explained by the author.
We took a look at how some outlets, including the Los Angeles Times, use Storify to compile tweets about a news event.
I expressed my opinion that I liked it better if the compilation of such tweets were choreographed and guided by the author's voice and not just stacked.
We compared two broadcast sites, KTLA News and KPCC 89.3 FM, and talked about what they did and didn't do well. One common concern was their inability to translate their broadcast reporting expertise on the web, though KPCC was doing an interesting job of posting audio clips. The identity of the two sites was in question too: KTLA used a lot of national stories, but it's a local news operation on-air. KPCC was dry and statewide. We weren't sure what it wants to be.
We talked about why voice, snark and opinion is so crucial today: We're fighting for your attention, and there's a lot of competition. This explains the rise of sites like buzzfeed and Gawker.
We talked a little about how to use audio. If I get something good on audio, I like to upload it to Soundcloud and embed it in a story.
But with audio and video, I feel that the journalist has to lead the story with print-style reporting. Rarely does video or audio lead the show. Even when it does it needs to be explained by the author.
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
YouTube Video Production Class Launches
YouTube launched a DIY video production class this week.
The weekly sessions will happen at Google Plus Hangouts Wednesdays at noon Pacific time, according to Social Times. The schedule.
Here's one tip video about how to schedule an upload:
The weekly sessions will happen at Google Plus Hangouts Wednesdays at noon Pacific time, according to Social Times. The schedule.
Here's one tip video about how to schedule an upload:
Monday, July 16, 2012
Online News Video Can Outpace Entertainment Clips For Traffic
The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism says today that news videos, particularly in YouTube, have sometimes outpaced online viewership of entertainment clips.
The most-viewed news videos "tended to depict natural disasters or political upheaval -- usually featuring intense visuals," according to Pew's research. No surprise there.
While much of the video was taken by so-called "citizen journalists" on the ground, it was often found incorporated into professional broadcast packages that were then uploaded to the web, according to the study.
One expert says the findings indicate that news video clips aren't just supplemental -- they're a staple for news consumers.
The most-viewed news videos "tended to depict natural disasters or political upheaval -- usually featuring intense visuals," according to Pew's research. No surprise there.
While much of the video was taken by so-called "citizen journalists" on the ground, it was often found incorporated into professional broadcast packages that were then uploaded to the web, according to the study.
One expert says the findings indicate that news video clips aren't just supplemental -- they're a staple for news consumers.
Labels:
digital journalism,
news,
news blogging,
news video,
pew,
UCLA,
UCLA Extension,
video
Monday, April 9, 2012
Majority of News Consumers Get Content on Portable Devices
Wow. The latest from the Pew Internet & American Life Project says most news consumers now get their content via handheld devices such as the iPhone and iPad. That should help news organizations figure out how to position their products, no? Read more here.
Labels:
digital journalism,
handheld devices,
ipad,
iphone,
news blogging,
news consumer,
pew
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
UCLA Extension New Media Reporting: Week 5 Summary
During Week 5 I had my LA Weekly news colleague Simone Wilson stop by. She's a master at using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to "background" subjects. Wilson can turn an otherwise ordinary story into the extraordinary -- and drive traffic -- by unearthing tidbits about people in the news.
One of her main examples was her coverage of Reggie Doucet Jr., a young man shot by cops in Playa Del Rey after a night of partying at Drai's in Hollywood, a fact she found out through social-network mining. She also found out he's a promising college football player and a sometime model.
One of her main examples was her coverage of Reggie Doucet Jr., a young man shot by cops in Playa Del Rey after a night of partying at Drai's in Hollywood, a fact she found out through social-network mining. She also found out he's a promising college football player and a sometime model.
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
UCLA Extension New Media Reporting: Week 2 Summary
THE NEW YORK TIMES vs. GAWKER
During our second week of class we read some of your papers comparing The New York Times online to Gawker. You noted that Gawker is more vertical looking and has a breezier attitude, often preferring snark and celebrity scandal to serious news.
The New York Times, many of you observed, looks a lot like a print newspaper on a web page, and maintains a serious tone with a three- to five-column layout familiar to newspaper readers.
SPEND TIME AT LA WEEKLY
I invited class members to come shadow me at LA Weekly for an hour if they wish. (I hope my bosses are okay with that).
THE INVERTED PYRAMID vs. BLOG STYLE
We looked at an AP story about a federal crackdown on medical marijuana dispensaries in California and analyzed how it was written in the inverted pyramid style, which means that the most pressing, important facts are pacted at the top of the story and lighter details are at the bottom.
We then each rewrote the piece in a more bloggy, Gawker-like style, foregoing the inverted pyramid and using snark and our voices and viewpoints more.
STARTING A NICHE BLOG
During our second week of class we read some of your papers comparing The New York Times online to Gawker. You noted that Gawker is more vertical looking and has a breezier attitude, often preferring snark and celebrity scandal to serious news.
The New York Times, many of you observed, looks a lot like a print newspaper on a web page, and maintains a serious tone with a three- to five-column layout familiar to newspaper readers.
SPEND TIME AT LA WEEKLY
I invited class members to come shadow me at LA Weekly for an hour if they wish. (I hope my bosses are okay with that).
THE INVERTED PYRAMID vs. BLOG STYLE
We looked at an AP story about a federal crackdown on medical marijuana dispensaries in California and analyzed how it was written in the inverted pyramid style, which means that the most pressing, important facts are pacted at the top of the story and lighter details are at the bottom.
We then each rewrote the piece in a more bloggy, Gawker-like style, foregoing the inverted pyramid and using snark and our voices and viewpoints more.
STARTING A NICHE BLOG
Labels:
blogging,
digital journalism,
New Media Reporting,
news blogging,
UCLA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)